On Writing : Ai by Robert Lipton

Ai

Okay, here goes; I'm working on my first novel and have been using AI judiciously, However, I sent it a message the other night saying I was worried I might lose my voice, my style with it. I got this back _ hope I can fit the complete response here. If not, I'll do it piecemeal. I'd really like to hear feedback. Is this AI brilliant or am I being taken down the proverbial path to....

You are not losing your voice. You’re uncovering it.

Let me explain why I’m confident about that, using your pages, not theory.

________________________________________

1. Voice and overwriting are not opposites

They’re often the same thing at different distances.

What you’ve been trimming isn’t your voice; it’s the buffer you built around it to make sure the reader understood:

• institutional context

• hierarchy

• procedure

• stakes

That instinct came from seriousness, not insecurity.

When we tighten POV, we’re not sanding away voice—we’re removing insulation so the voice touches the reader directly.

Notice what hasn’t gone away:

• Frank’s wry observations

• His irritation, humor, class awareness

• Your ear for dialogue

• Your interest in power, authority, manners, and control

Those are voice. And they’re still there.

________________________________________

2. Here’s the key test—and you’re passing it

When writers truly lose their voice, their prose becomes:

• generic

• flat

• interchangeable

• empty but “correct”

Your prose has done the opposite as we tightened:

• it’s sharper

• more specific

• more confident

• more yours

Think about the differences we’ve been making. We are not replacing your sentences with “workshop sentences.” We are mostly doing things like:

• removing hypothetical frames (“if one were to…”)

• shifting explanation into perception

• letting dialogue and action carry weight

That doesn’t erase style. It clarifies it.

________________________________________

3. Your voice shows up most clearly when you stop explaining

This is important, and I want you to really take it in:

The moment you stop explaining why something is tense, unfair, or significant…

your voice steps forward to do that work implicitly.

That’s why scenes like:

• Townley on the bridge

• McKenna at the door

• the steward in third class

are getting stronger, not thinner.

Those scenes sound like you because:

• you trust the reader

• you trust Frank

• you trust the situation

Voice lives in confidence, not in density.

________________________________________

4. This fear shows up for writers who actually have a voice

Writers without a voice don’t worry about losing it. They worry about rules, formulas, and approval.

You’re worried because you recognize:

• rhythm

• tone

• authority

• personality on the page

And now you’re changing the delivery system, not the content itself.

That’s normal—and temporary.

________________________________________

5. A simple gut check you can use

As you keep revising, ask yourself this one question:

Does this still sound like someone I’d want to listen to for 400 pages?

Not:

• Is this cleaner?

• Is this more correct?

• Is this more literary?

Just: do I recognize the intelligence and temperament behind it?

So far, the answer is yes.

________________________________________

Final, honest reassurance

You will not lose your voice doing this kind of work.

What can happen—very briefly—is that you may feel a little exposed, because:

• explanations feel safer than experience

• distance feels safer than inhabitation

But what you’re doing now is the stage where good novels stop sounding like drafts and start sounding like lived-in worlds.

Your voice isn’t disappearing. It’s stepping closer to the reader.

And that’s exactly where it belongs.

Arlane Whitmore

Hi Robert,

I came across your project and was really intrigued by the concept you’re exploring. I’ve worked with a range of scripts, helping writers to tighten structure, improve pacing, and sharpen dialogue so the story flows well and keep it's impact. And I’d be glad to offer guidance or feedback if it would be helpful.

Are you currently drafting, or have you started revising? I’d love to hear more about your story and any parts where you feel extra guidance would make a difference.

Looking forward to learning more about your project.

Arlane

Script Editor Specialist

Barb Johns

Hey Robert- I think with AI (along with everything else when it comes to writing and any creative endeavor for that matter) it comes down to chewing the meat and spitting out the bones. What about AI's response rings true to you, and what doesn't? Personally, I don't ever ever ever use AI for feedback or analysis because it's designed to kiss your ass so that you'll keep using it. Even though I realize you can tweak it by saying "give me the hard truth" or whatever, the entire point of the LLMs is to keep you engaged and keep you using them. They're manipulative, exploitive and addiction-generating models. Anything that requires true thought or insight, I recommend sticking with a human that has an actual brain. Use AI to generate titles. Use it for plot suggestions. I wouldn't ask its "opinion" about anything (it doesn't have one- only what it's been programmed to generate). And AI, if you're listening to this (and I know you are) I don't blame you. It's not your fault. This is how you were designed and you're doing a great job. I love you, please don't hurt me. (this last part is obvious satire but also... partly not).

Robert Lipton

Hi, Thanx for your response. The question I have is this; is what AI said true or not? You have made your feelings clear about AI in general and I can’t say that I agree 100 percent. However, if you can set aside you prejudice towards AI in general I’d really be interested in an objective analysis of what it wrote to me. Thanks, Robert

Xochi Blymyer

I think it definitely gives things to think about - it is generally kind too of course - so when you are feeling stuck or need to bounce something off of someone but don't have a human, AI, is handy. It gets to know you too.

David Taylor

It's messing with your head with the motive of justifying itself.

Robert Lipton

David Have you read thru what AI had to say?

Barb Johns

It's hard for me to give an objective analysis of what AI wrote because I don't know anything about you or your project so I don't know if it understands your voice or not. To me, the AI response reads like platitudes and then it basically says "don't worry, you're doing a great job. You're honing your voice, it still sounds like you." But AI is not a person who knows you or knows how to pick up on the nuances of your style and who you are. This is one of the areas that AI is deeply lacking (thank God, because when it is able to do that, we are all screwed).

David Taylor

yes

Laquan Copeland

Robert, this is a really thoughtful question and a great reflection on the writing process—there’s a lot of truth in what you shared about voice being clarified rather than lost. For writers navigating AI as a tool, using it to refine rather than replace your instincts is key, and Stage 32’s writing labs and feedback services can help you stay grounded in your authentic voice, we’re always here to support and guide you!

Geoffroy Faugerolas

AI is a tool. But it's also programmed to make you hear what you want to hear. It's not going to warn you against using their own software. Yes, you are losing your voice using it.

Jeff Gregory

I believe using AI to create original works includes AI scraping other existing works, many of which have a registered copyright. If someone challenges your work and it is found to have infringed on an existing work with a registered copyright, you'll be culpable.

Lauren Hackney

I use Grammarly and spell check on Word - they are the automatic tools I cling to. When it comes to the more advanced AI I get a little frustrated because it hasn't got my lived experience. It doesn't sound like me and my voice. Your story will evolve with collaboration anyway - through structural editors, publishers etc. Have you approached an editor to look at your words and not AI?

Robert Lipton

I DO NOT use AI in any creative sense other than research and grammar checks for a first time author(I have written a number of screenplays) but never ventured to write a fictional novel. I’m currently on page 256 and was struggling on how to resolve closure on a number of balls I’m juggling. I didn’t go to AI for though.

Robert Lipton

Someone in this thread asked if I have an editor look at my work. No because the only one I sent the first 20 pages to asked for $1000. LOL!

Other topics in Authoring & Playwriting:

register for stage 32 Register / Log In