Screenwriting : Is there such a thing as too much research? by Alex Winck

Alex Winck

Is there such a thing as too much research?

Of course I understand that doing your homework on the themes of the screenplay, novel, graphic novel, whatever you´re writing is crucial, but sometimes it feels like the research becomes a bit of a writing crutch. I often feel like that reading certain novels or watching something like a procedural show. It´s like the writer doesn´t know what to do with the plot and characters, or has done a ton of research and wants to put it all in the book, or screenplay, or whatever, or the editor demanded at least 400 pages and the story ends easily at 250, whatever. But as you read and you watch it, you can almost hear the writer saying, "look how thoroughly I researched it all, looking for every minute detail, who cares if it adds nothing relevant for the story?". Now, of course it´s impressive when a writer gives you something surprisingly detailed, especially in a novel, when the writer is everything, the set designer, the wardrobe designer, etc., but often times I feel like it ends up distracting me from what I really bought it for, that is, the story, the characters. If you´re gonna take two pages of your book to describe a house, I feel like you´d better have a very good story reason to do it, otherwise a couple paragraphs is more than enough. And of course that´s even moreso for a screenplay, where you do have a set designer, a wardrobe department and everything, and you shouldn´t be trying to do their job. Now, is too much research better than too little, than stuff that just relies on clichés and stereotypes and vague notions that turn out to be highly inaccurate? Maybe, but I´d say just as important as doing your research is keeping it focused. You can go on all tangents as you´re researching, you never know when you´re gonna step on something really interesting for your story, but when you sit down to write it, to know what to throw away is just as important as what to include. What you guys think?

Cherie Grant

I think I can agree. To put it succinctly.

Shelley Stuart

When using an element in my stories I try to ask myself "do I know this is true for a fact, or am I basing this moment on assumption and heresay"? If the answer is "because I studied it in college" I'm OK. If it's "I saw somebody mention it on Facebook", it's time for more research. Some people use "research" to avoid the actual writing part. At some point you've got to stop looking at facts and start writing the fiction, knowing that the audience is pretty flexible with the facts anyway.

Alex Winck

Alle Segretti, I understand what you mean, maybe I should have phrased the discussion title better, of course as you´re doing the research for your story you should look up as much as you can, what I mean is sometimes when the writer sits down to write it, they don´t let go of the information that doesn´t really help the story, or, as Shelley Stuart puts it, sometimes people load the story with information cuz they´re avoiding the real creative part, which is to turn your knowledge into compelling fiction.

Lynn P. H. Adrian

Nice thread. I know my zealous research is over compensation for fear of getting it wrong. I am writing "Johnny Blood," and adaptation of Denis Gullickson's book, "Vagabond Halfback: The Life and Times of Johnny Blood McNally." I have the whole of Green Bay, Wisconsin breathing down my neck. When "Leatherheads" premiered (loosely based on Johnny's story, Green Bay looked on in chagrin at what Packer experts along with aficionados (most of the 200,000 citizens of Green Bay as well as devotees across the planet) deemed the film a cheap misuse of a treasured hero's life and his heyday (1920's). And when all is said and done, I still have to part ways with the research and honor the story that I create. Help.

Other topics in Screenwriting:

register for stage 32 Register / Log In