It's been more than a month since WIFTI chapters from around the world gathered in Adare, Ireland, for the 2026 WIFTI Summit, International Women's Day has come and gone, and now we’re almost at the end of Women's History Month. But what have we actually learned? What stuck? What still stings? And where do we go from here?
This month, I wanted to take some time to reflect on the ideas and conversations that surround this month and ask you to reflect too. Because the truth is, reflection without action is just a nice feeling, and the data is screaming at us to consider real, actionable change because we simply don't have the luxury of becoming complacent.
We talk about progress, and we celebrate visible wins. But the data published in the months surrounding the Summit paints a picture that demands systemic change and not just applause.
29% of the top 100 grossing films in 2025 featured female protagonists, down from 42% in 2024. (Center for the Study of Women in Television and Film, SDSU, 2026)
Women directed just 13% of the top 250 grossing films in 2025 (The Celluloid Ceiling, SDSU, 2026). Among the top 100, that number drops further to just 8.1%, or 9 out of 111 directors, and only 5.4% of directors were women of color (USC Annenberg Inclusion Initiative, 2026)
7% of the top 250 films in 2025 employed 10 or more women in key behind-the-scenes roles. Meanwhile, 75% employed 10 or more men. (The Celluloid Ceiling, SDSU, 2026)
7% of composers working on 2025's top 250 films were women, a slight rise from 5%. Cinematographers, by contrast, dropped sharply from 12% to 7%. (The Celluloid Ceiling, SDSU, 2026)
29% of the 2025 Oscar nominations went to women. Non-binary and transgender filmmakers received 0% and 0.4%, respectively. (Women in Film, 2026)
And here's one more number that should silence every “but we've come so far” conversation;
+6%
That is the total increase in women's overall behind-the-scenes representation across the top 250 films. To clarify, that's from 17% in 1998 to 23% in 2025. Six percentage points. In 27 years. (The Celluloid Ceiling, SDSU)
I want all of you to sit with that for a moment.
This is not a pipeline problem or a talent problem. It is a systemic, structural problem.

Over four extraordinary days, WIFTI brought together creatives, industry leaders, advocates, policymakers and allies from across the globe who were all united by a shared commitment to gender equality and meaningful change across the screen industries.
People spoke candidly about what wasn't working, and they called out the systems that protect the status quo. But we need the status quo to start paying attention.
Here is the most compelling data point in all of this:
71% of writers on films with at least one female director were women. Compare that to 11% on films with male directors only. (The Celluloid Ceiling, SDSU, 2026)
22% of cinematographers on films with a female director were women. Versus just 5% on male-directed films. (The Celluloid Ceiling, SDSU, 2026)
28% of editors on films with a female director were women. Versus just 19% on male-directed films. (The Celluloid Ceiling, SDSU, 2026)
When women lead, women get hired. When women get hired, different stories get told, and when different stories get told, different audiences feel seen, and they show up.
The 2026 UCLA Hollywood Diversity Report makes this commercially explicit: studios are leaving money on the table. Films with diverse casts consistently outperform at the box office, and yet the industry continues to retreat from the very practices that drive that performance.
This is not a social justice argument alone - although it absolutely is that too. It is a business argument. And we should be making both, very loudly, in every room we enter.

Across the globe, WIFT chapters were gathering to mark International Women's Day with exactly this kind of honest reckoning. In Warsaw, WIFT Poland (led by Chapter President & Stage 32 Brand Ambassador, Karolina Rum) co-hosted a panel with Kino Praha titled "Women Behind the Camera," bringing together production coordinator Anna Komosa, editor Anna Luka, production manager Patrycja Kycia, production designer Ewa Mroczkowska, and moderator/journalist Anna Tatarska.
The panel surfaced a question that deserves to sit at the heart of every industry conversation right now:
Karolina Rum frames the answer through the lens of intergenerational collaboration, which is a concept she calls not just beneficial, but strategically necessary:
Younger creators are bringing fluency in emerging platforms, digital culture, and audience behaviour. Seasoned professionals bring institutional memory, understanding of industry cycles, and the hard-won calm of decades navigating both crisis and success. When these strengths intersect, the room gets bigger than any single generation's experience.
But Karolina is clear about the obstacle: gatekeeping. The industry has long been structured around hierarchical access. Who gets the meeting, who controls financing, who 'gets to fail.' Intergenerational collaboration demands we reimagine gatekeeping not as a barrier but as a bridge.

One of the most resonant voices in Australian cinema right now is director Sophie Hyde, whose semi-autobiographical film Jimpa (starring Olivia Colman and John Lithgow) is in Australian cinemas now, distributed by Kismet Movies.
WIFT Vic Vice President Katie Page spoke with Sophie about what it means to bring a deeply personal, queer, intergenerational story to the screen, and their words cut right to the bone of everything we've been discussing.
Jimpa grew from loss and love: Sophie's late father, a provocative gay man driven by social justice, and her child Aud's growing public identity as a trans person. The impulse to create a space for that conversation became the film.
Sophie's film is itself a proof of concept. Here is an Australian female director, working with Olivia Colman and John Lithgow, making a queer intergenerational story across three countries. It exists. It is in cinemas. And it matters. Not just artistically, but as evidence of what becomes possible when the right people are given the keys.
What Sophie describes about making Jimpa - building trust quickly with new international collaborators, offering something personal, having it met - is genuinely a model for the kind of industry we're trying to build. Reciprocal. Honest. Human.
It sounds radical in its simplicity, but in an industry that has spent decades asking women and gender-diverse people to make themselves smaller, it is radical, and it is exactly the spirit the WIFTI community was built on.
Click here to read the full interview with Sophie Hyde!

We know the problem. We have the data. What we need now are structural solutions. Here's what the conversations of this past month are pointing toward:
Diversity pledges without enforcement are wallpaper. The industry needs clear, auditable gender targets embedded into funding conditions. Not as a bonus, but as a baseline. France has required productions receiving CNC funding to complete gender-based violence training, with obligations progressively extended to full crews. In Norway, 40% of publicly backed productions are directed by women, and they have now surpassed their own target. These are working models to look at and implement locally.
The data is unambiguous. When a woman directs, women get hired across every department. Hiring one woman in the chair is a systemic lever. Funders, studios, and streaming platforms need to treat it as one.
According to France's CNC Gender Equality report, films directed by women had budgets approximately 39% lower than those directed by men in 2024. Lower budgets mean fewer screens, less marketing, and less visibility, which is a cycle that perpetuates the underrepresentation it appears to reflect.
Getting in the door is not enough. Mid-career support, mentorship exchange, and long-term career infrastructure are what turn individuals into an industry.
Although many film institutes have developed GEDI strategies, it's important that we continue to collect data, whether that work is institutionalised or driven independently. We cannot fix what we do not measure. Every chapter, every studio, every funding body needs to be collecting gendered data and making it public.
Women creators on streaming programs rose to 36% in 2024-25, which is a historic high, and almost double the 20% on broadcast. This is where progress is happening. This is the result of deliberate decisions by platforms that treat inclusion as a strategic priority. We need to learn from this, amplify it, and demand the same from theatrical.
We'd love to hear from you because these are the questions we're sitting with:
Let's hear your thoughts in the comments below!
Got an idea for a post? Or have you collaborated with Stage 32 members to create a project? We'd love to hear about it. Email Ashley at blog@stage32.com and let's get your post published!
Please help support your fellow Stage 32ers by sharing this on social. Check out the social media buttons at the top to share on Instagram @stage32 Twitter @stage32 Facebook @stage32 and LinkedIn @stage-32
| An Insider’s Guide To Your First Meeting With A Producer Or Studio Executive |
| Stop Waiting, Start Moving: Your Creative Breakthrough Starts Here! |
There are now 4170 blog posts for you to enjoy. Search them all by tags below.
Acting, Advice, Cinematography, Coffee & Content, Composing, Contests, Distribution, Featured, Filmmaking, Financing, Inspirational, Networking, Producing, Screenwriting, Success Stories, Tips, Trending,