There’s a lot of heated conversation in the film industry about the role of visual effects, especially as more audiences grow tired of overused CGI. But many of those debates are rooted in confusion over definitions. What is the difference between SFX, VFX, and CGI?
This video breaks it all down:
• SFX (Special Effects): Practical effects created on set—explosions, squibs, rain machines, etc.
• VFX (Visual Effects): Anything added or manipulated after the shot—compositing, green screen, digital environments.
• CGI (Computer-Generated Imagery): A type of VFX—3D models, creatures, assets made completely in a computer.
Watch the full video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pok6EN3cfA4
The debate isn’t just technical, it’s creative. Has CGI become a crutch? Are practical effects always better? Or is the real key how and when you use each tool?
This video explores those questions with nuance and depth, especially as more filmmakers claim they’re “CGI-free” when that might not be entirely accurate.
What are your thoughts on the current state of visual effects in film? Do you prefer practical effects where possible, or do you think CGI gets a bad rap? How do you personally decide what’s worth solving in post vs. capturing in camera?
3 people like this
Ashley Renee Smith thanks for sharing this! I've been watching tutorials to learn DaVicini since winning the software back in July. Funny enough I literally just started a project last night that has...
Expand commentAshley Renee Smith thanks for sharing this! I've been watching tutorials to learn DaVicini since winning the software back in July. Funny enough I literally just started a project last night that has voice over so the timing of this video is perfect. Look forward to watching it tonight when editing.